2014 - Hazard Analysis Methods in Support of Safety-Related Decisions
Date2014-07-18
Deadline2014-07-18
VenueVirtual Webinar, USA - United States
KeywordsRisk analysis; Hazard analysis; Safety analysis
Topics/Call fo Papers
Instructor: Michael Allocco
Description:
Unfortunately, in many cases the safety engineer enters the program later, and consequently, must meet an inappropriate program objective, while attempting to fix an ill-chosen complex design; which presents additional challenges due to decision errors, engineering errors, system complexity, excessive automation, advanced science, and the over complex involvement of software, firmware, hardware, the human, and environment. So then, considering limited time and resources, what should the safety professional and decision maker do?
Safety professionals work in imperfect entities, and they may spend excessive time and resources attempting to meet an inappropriate program objective and/or fixing an inadequate complex design, process or procedure. This may be due to poor initial decisions. Consider that the decision-makers may not have understood system safety axioms. Ideally, the system safety engineer should participate in the initial decisions concerning a new or modified design. Unfortunately, in many cases the safety engineer enters the program later, and consequently, must meet an inappropriate program objective, while attempting to fix an ill-chosen complex design; which presents additional challenges due to decision errors, engineering errors, system complexity, excessive automation, advanced science, and the over complex involvement of software, firmware, hardware, the human, and environment. So then, considering limited time and resources, what should the safety professional and decision maker do?
Why Should you Attend:
Any professional who is responsible for making decisions that may inadvertently have an adverse effect on a product, process, procedure or system; considering that the human is an integrated element of the system.
Objectives of the Presentation:
We will discuss the methods that may enable more efficient system safety, safety engineering and safety management application by overcoming illogic and by applying concise system hazard analysis, risk assessment, and hazard control application. These methods address risk assessment, with taxonomy to describe risk, getting back to safety basics, and overcoming the performance paradox.
Who can Benefit:
Safety professionals and other decision makers will benefit by enhancing knowledge in the application of concise system hazard analysis, risk assessment, and hazard control application. These methods will address risk assessment, a taxonomy to describe risk, getting back to safety basics, and overcoming the performance paradox, as well as
Business Owners
Risk Managers
Design Manager & Engineers
System Safety
Decision Makers
Company Management
Register Now:
http://www.onlinecompliancepanel.com/ecommerce/web...
Online Compliance Panel LLC
38868 Salmon Ter
Fremont, CA, USA
94536
Toll Free: 1-510-857-5896
Description:
Unfortunately, in many cases the safety engineer enters the program later, and consequently, must meet an inappropriate program objective, while attempting to fix an ill-chosen complex design; which presents additional challenges due to decision errors, engineering errors, system complexity, excessive automation, advanced science, and the over complex involvement of software, firmware, hardware, the human, and environment. So then, considering limited time and resources, what should the safety professional and decision maker do?
Safety professionals work in imperfect entities, and they may spend excessive time and resources attempting to meet an inappropriate program objective and/or fixing an inadequate complex design, process or procedure. This may be due to poor initial decisions. Consider that the decision-makers may not have understood system safety axioms. Ideally, the system safety engineer should participate in the initial decisions concerning a new or modified design. Unfortunately, in many cases the safety engineer enters the program later, and consequently, must meet an inappropriate program objective, while attempting to fix an ill-chosen complex design; which presents additional challenges due to decision errors, engineering errors, system complexity, excessive automation, advanced science, and the over complex involvement of software, firmware, hardware, the human, and environment. So then, considering limited time and resources, what should the safety professional and decision maker do?
Why Should you Attend:
Any professional who is responsible for making decisions that may inadvertently have an adverse effect on a product, process, procedure or system; considering that the human is an integrated element of the system.
Objectives of the Presentation:
We will discuss the methods that may enable more efficient system safety, safety engineering and safety management application by overcoming illogic and by applying concise system hazard analysis, risk assessment, and hazard control application. These methods address risk assessment, with taxonomy to describe risk, getting back to safety basics, and overcoming the performance paradox.
Who can Benefit:
Safety professionals and other decision makers will benefit by enhancing knowledge in the application of concise system hazard analysis, risk assessment, and hazard control application. These methods will address risk assessment, a taxonomy to describe risk, getting back to safety basics, and overcoming the performance paradox, as well as
Business Owners
Risk Managers
Design Manager & Engineers
System Safety
Decision Makers
Company Management
Register Now:
http://www.onlinecompliancepanel.com/ecommerce/web...
Online Compliance Panel LLC
38868 Salmon Ter
Fremont, CA, USA
94536
Toll Free: 1-510-857-5896
Other CFPs
- GAMP 5 and its Application to Computer System Categorization and Validation
- Nonresident Alien Vendors - How to Handle the Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Requirements
- How Best to Prepare to Host a Regulatory Audit
- To file or not to file an NDA Application: When GCP Noncompliance Compromises your Pivotal Trial
- Personal Protective Equipment
Last modified: 2014-05-30 21:23:23