WDDD 2012 - Tenth Workshop on Duplicating, Deconstructing and Debunking
Date2012-06-10
Deadline2012-04-25
VenueOregon, USA - United States
Keywords
Websitehttp://isca2012.ittc.ku.edu/
Topics/Call fo Papers
WDDD provides the computer systems research community a forum for work that validates or duplicates earlier results; deconstructs prior findings by providing greater, in-depth insight into causal relationships or correlations; or debunks earlier findings by describing precisely how and why proposed techniques fail where earlier successes were claimed, or succeed where failure was reported.
Traditionally, computer systems research conferences have focused almost exclusively on novelty and performance, neglecting an abundance of interesting work that lacks one or both of these attributes. A significant part of research--in fact, the backbone of the scientific method--involves independent validation of existing work and the exploration of strange ideas that never pan out. This workshop provides a venue for disseminating such work in our community. Published validation experiments strengthen existing work, while thorough comparisons provide new dimensions and perspectives. Studies that refute or correct existing work also strengthen the research community, by ensuring that published material is technically correct and has sound assumptions. Publishing negative or strange or unexpected results will allow future researchers to learn the hard lessons of others, without repeating their effort.
This workshop will set a high scientific standard for such experiments, and will require insightful analysis to justify all conclusions. The workshop will favor submissions that provide meaningful insights, and identify underlying root causes for the failure or success of the investigated technique. Acceptable work must thoroughly investigate and communicate why the proposed technique performs as the results indicate. WDDD has a unique tradition of asking the original paper authors to provide a follow-up comment after the WDDD paper has been presented, where appropriate. The follow-up comment may take the form of a rebuttal or additional insight from the original authors.
Submission Topics
Independent validation of earlier results with meaningful analysis
In-depth analysis and sensitivity studies that provide further insight into earlier findings, or identify key parameters or assumptions that affect the results
Studies that refute earlier findings, with clear justification and explanation
Negative results for ideas that intuitively make sense and should work, along with explanations for why they do not
Validation/refutation of controversial advertising claims by industrial competitors
Workshop Scope
Computer Architecture
Processor architecture/microarchitecture
Memory hierarchy
Multiprocessor systems
Power-efficient architecture
Dependable architectures
Compiler/architecture interaction
Application-specific, reconfigurable and embedded architecture
Code Generation and Optimization
Feedback-driven optimization
Phase-based optimization
Dynamic compilation, adaptive/continuous optimization
Modulo/trace scheduling
Efficient profiling techniques
Binary translation/optimization
Compilation support for thread level speculation
Traditionally, computer systems research conferences have focused almost exclusively on novelty and performance, neglecting an abundance of interesting work that lacks one or both of these attributes. A significant part of research--in fact, the backbone of the scientific method--involves independent validation of existing work and the exploration of strange ideas that never pan out. This workshop provides a venue for disseminating such work in our community. Published validation experiments strengthen existing work, while thorough comparisons provide new dimensions and perspectives. Studies that refute or correct existing work also strengthen the research community, by ensuring that published material is technically correct and has sound assumptions. Publishing negative or strange or unexpected results will allow future researchers to learn the hard lessons of others, without repeating their effort.
This workshop will set a high scientific standard for such experiments, and will require insightful analysis to justify all conclusions. The workshop will favor submissions that provide meaningful insights, and identify underlying root causes for the failure or success of the investigated technique. Acceptable work must thoroughly investigate and communicate why the proposed technique performs as the results indicate. WDDD has a unique tradition of asking the original paper authors to provide a follow-up comment after the WDDD paper has been presented, where appropriate. The follow-up comment may take the form of a rebuttal or additional insight from the original authors.
Submission Topics
Independent validation of earlier results with meaningful analysis
In-depth analysis and sensitivity studies that provide further insight into earlier findings, or identify key parameters or assumptions that affect the results
Studies that refute earlier findings, with clear justification and explanation
Negative results for ideas that intuitively make sense and should work, along with explanations for why they do not
Validation/refutation of controversial advertising claims by industrial competitors
Workshop Scope
Computer Architecture
Processor architecture/microarchitecture
Memory hierarchy
Multiprocessor systems
Power-efficient architecture
Dependable architectures
Compiler/architecture interaction
Application-specific, reconfigurable and embedded architecture
Code Generation and Optimization
Feedback-driven optimization
Phase-based optimization
Dynamic compilation, adaptive/continuous optimization
Modulo/trace scheduling
Efficient profiling techniques
Binary translation/optimization
Compilation support for thread level speculation
Other CFPs
- 5th Workshop on Architectural and Microarchitectural Support for Binary Translation
- Intellectbase Multi-Disciplinary Academic Conference
- 18th International Conference on Soft Computing MENDEL 2012
- Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining
- Remote Sensing Summer School 2012 (IEEE GRSS / TUM)
Last modified: 2012-03-12 14:38:13