Healthcare 2020 - Design History Files (DHF), Device Master Records (DMR), Device History Records (DHR), Technical Documentation Files - The US FDA and EU MDR Requirements
Date2020-09-08
Deadline2020-09-08
VenueOnline, USA - United States
KeywordsHealthcare; Pharmaceutical; Medical online training
Topics/Call fo Papers
Overview:
It will also consider the European Union's MDR Technical Documentation requirements, and evaluate the documents' differing purposes / goals, as well as the two different device classification schemes. Required and desirable contents will be discussed.
Also considered: Areas requiring frequent re-evaluation / update; Similarities and differences; Future trends; Typical DHF Table of Contents; Technical documentation File Table of Contents; The importance and usefulness of the "General Safety and Performance Requirements" (the old "Essential Requirements"); Structure of the "Declaration of Conformity"; self-declaring changes and/or N-B reviewed; Parallel approaches to development. Finally, the differing approaches to file audits by the FDA and the Notified Body will be discussed.
Why you should Attend: One of our most popular webinars, continuously updated with the latest U.S. FDA and European Union requirements. As U.S. companies go global, they must meet different product design documentation. The cGMPs mandate Design Control and the Design History File (DHF). In order to sell globally, the EU's CE-marking documentation is a requirement - the Technical Documentation (TD). Currently they serve different purposes, support different goals, but the TD is moving in the direction of the DHF. And the DHF is adapting to some of the features of the TD, while each serve differing goals. And how / where do the DMR and DHR fit? Being aware of the similarities and differences in the files and their individual documents can further concurrent development and/or updates to both. "
Areas Covered in the Session:
The EU's MDR and the Technical File / Design Dossier
Device Classification - U.S. FDA vs. EU MDR
Design Control 'Over Time' vs. a Product's 'Snapshot in Time' - Differing Philosophies
DHF "Typical" Contents and Deliverables
The DMR and DHR / Lot / Batch Record
TF / DD Required Contents
Parallel Approaches to Documentation - Teams
FDA and NB Audit Focus
Who Will Benefit:
Senior Management in Drugs, Devices, Biologics, Dietary Supplements
QA
RA
R&D
Engineering
Production
Operations
Marketing
Speaker Profile
John E. Lincoln is a medical device and regulatory affairs consultant. He has helped companies to implement or modify their GMP systems and procedures, product risk management, U.S. FDA responses. In addition, he has successfully designed, written and run all types of process, equipment and software qualifications/validations, which have passed FDA audit or submission scrutin
It will also consider the European Union's MDR Technical Documentation requirements, and evaluate the documents' differing purposes / goals, as well as the two different device classification schemes. Required and desirable contents will be discussed.
Also considered: Areas requiring frequent re-evaluation / update; Similarities and differences; Future trends; Typical DHF Table of Contents; Technical documentation File Table of Contents; The importance and usefulness of the "General Safety and Performance Requirements" (the old "Essential Requirements"); Structure of the "Declaration of Conformity"; self-declaring changes and/or N-B reviewed; Parallel approaches to development. Finally, the differing approaches to file audits by the FDA and the Notified Body will be discussed.
Why you should Attend: One of our most popular webinars, continuously updated with the latest U.S. FDA and European Union requirements. As U.S. companies go global, they must meet different product design documentation. The cGMPs mandate Design Control and the Design History File (DHF). In order to sell globally, the EU's CE-marking documentation is a requirement - the Technical Documentation (TD). Currently they serve different purposes, support different goals, but the TD is moving in the direction of the DHF. And the DHF is adapting to some of the features of the TD, while each serve differing goals. And how / where do the DMR and DHR fit? Being aware of the similarities and differences in the files and their individual documents can further concurrent development and/or updates to both. "
Areas Covered in the Session:
The EU's MDR and the Technical File / Design Dossier
Device Classification - U.S. FDA vs. EU MDR
Design Control 'Over Time' vs. a Product's 'Snapshot in Time' - Differing Philosophies
DHF "Typical" Contents and Deliverables
The DMR and DHR / Lot / Batch Record
TF / DD Required Contents
Parallel Approaches to Documentation - Teams
FDA and NB Audit Focus
Who Will Benefit:
Senior Management in Drugs, Devices, Biologics, Dietary Supplements
QA
RA
R&D
Engineering
Production
Operations
Marketing
Speaker Profile
John E. Lincoln is a medical device and regulatory affairs consultant. He has helped companies to implement or modify their GMP systems and procedures, product risk management, U.S. FDA responses. In addition, he has successfully designed, written and run all types of process, equipment and software qualifications/validations, which have passed FDA audit or submission scrutin
Other CFPs
- Webinar on Nanotechnology and Nanoscience
- Essentials of Validation – IQ, OQ, PQ
- Mastering Excel: How to Create ad hoc and Date Based Groupings within a PivotTable
- International Conference on Cloud Computing, Security and Blockchain (CLSB 2020)
- International Conference on Advances in Software Engineering (ASOFT 2020)
Last modified: 2020-07-03 17:26:20